Managing claims Q&A: Answers to some of our most common claims questions

We asked our claims representatives what questions they typically hear from employers who are managing employees with workers’ compensation claims. Here are a few common questions, and the answers:

How do we manage performance issues when an employee has an active workers’ compensation claim?

When an injured employee isn’t performing the duties of their job up to your standards, the first thing you need to ask yourself is whether the substandard performance is related to the work injury.

If it is related, you may need to review the tasks assigned and confirm they fall within the employee’s medical restrictions. Your claims representative and rehab professional (if one is working with the employee) can assist with this process.

If it is unrelated to the injury, the next thing you need to ask yourself is how other employees are treated when similar performance issues arise. All employees should be treated the same, including the injured employee.

After you’ve decided what you’re going to do, act promptly because your silence implies approval and condones the performance. If the performance concerns are not addressed right away, but you later bring up the issue as a reason for discipline or termination, the employee could claim the issue is simply a “pretext” and that the real reason for the discipline is the work injury. Employees cannot be disciplined for suffering a work injury.

Lastly, be sure that you thoroughly document any performance concerns and disciplinary action. If you do feel you need to terminate an employee who has suffered a work injury, we’d recommend discussing it with your claims representative and your employment law attorney. They can walk you through the potential workers’ compensation implications of terminating, and whether there may be a basis for an employment law claim.

How do we handle the employee’s health insurance premiums while they are off work due to a work injury?

This differs by state. For example, in Minnesota, the law prohibits terminating group insurance for an employee who is absent due to becoming totally disabled.

Talk with your employment law attorney to make sure you’re aware of any relevant laws and rules. Workers’ compensation wage loss benefits do not include health insurance premium withholding.

How do we maintain a good relationship with an employee who is off work due to a work injury?

The most important thing you can do after an injury is to stay in regular contact with the injured employee. Call or text the employee right away, and keep in touch.

First and foremost, let the employee know you care about them and want to see them recover. Send a card or small “get well” gift if appropriate.

Another thing you can do is to make sure the employee knows that you will provide any needed accommodations so that they can return to work as soon as they’ve healed enough to come back. Injured employees who are off work often worry that they won’t have a job to return to, and this will help alleviate those concerns.

If you ever have a question about managing a claim, don’t hesitate to reach out to your SFM claims representative for help.

 

This is not intended to serve as legal advice for individual fact-specific legal cases or as a legal basis for your employment practices.

Employee well-being is evolving beyond “do no harm”

Workplace safety and health is evolving beyond “do no harm”

A growing body of evidence shows that supporting employee health and well-being pays off for employers.

“A healthier workforce means less absenteeism, better productivity, better quality and higher overall morale,” said Loss Prevention Specialist Dana Mickelson. “A healthy workforce is also a safer workforce.”

Occupational health and safety is broadening to include all aspects of employee well-being, benefiting employees and employers alike.

Moving past ‘do no harm’

In the past, conceptions of workplace safety and health were based on the idea that work should “do no harm.” But we’re now seeing this broaden to a philosophy that work should support health, said Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry Commissioner Nancy Leppink.

“We used to silo the hazards and risks, and then assume that all other work was neutral,” she said. “We now recognize that all work can have a positive or negative impact on people’s lives.”

Some describe this shift as a focus on worker well-being, which can include emotional, mental, physical, financial and relational health. “People are happy, healthy, prosperous, fulfilled, purposeful, contented, comfortable — those are all terms that describe well-being,” Leppink said.

She cited a number of reasons for this evolution, including changing demographics. Millennials expect work that supports their well-being, she said, and on the other end of the age spectrum employees are working longer and therefore wanting to take better care of their health.

The changing nature of work, and especially the role of technology, is also a factor — from sitting all day, to never unplugging from work to dealing with constant distractions, she said. “In any given day you’re receiving texts, you’re receiving email messages. You’re being asked to pay attention and are distracted by multiple devices,” Leppink said. “Consequently, that results in greater levels of stress.”

The value in focusing on worker well-being

As companies embrace workplace well-being initiatives, more research is showing the benefits to employers.

A 2016 American Psychological Association survey linked senior management support for employee well-being to much higher rates of employee motivation, satisfaction and retention.

At companies where senior managers supported well-being, 91% of employees said they felt motivated to do their best versus 38% at other companies, according to the American Psychological Association survey. Similarly, only 25% of employees at companies valuing well-being said they intended to leave their job in the next year versus 51% at other companies.

Higher employee well-being correlates with higher employee productivity, customer loyalty and business unit productivity, according to a 2019 analysis by economists Christian Krekel, George Ward and Jan-Emmanuel De Neve. Their meta-analysis was based on 339 independent Gallup studies encompassing 1.8 million employees.

What employers are doing

Employers of all sizes are finding ways to support employee health in their workplaces.

It can be something as simple as being sure there are healthy food options in the break room vending machines, or offering ergonomic assessments of employees’ workstations and making any needed corrections.

Others provide sit-stand workstations or access to a gym onsite.

For others, it means offering an employee assistance program (EAP) or comprehensive wellness program, or even doing building renovations to make the workplace more supportive of employee well-being.

No matter where you are on the spectrum, there are always opportunities to do more to support the well-being of your workforce.

How to do it

So, how do you practically consider all aspects of your employees’ well-being when designing your work environment?

You can start by asking questions like:

  • How do my employees’ work schedules affect their physical and mental health?
  • Does our workplace support employees in healthy eating?
  • Is our workplace arranged in a way that encourages employees to get up and move throughout their workday?

 

On an individual scale, it’s about helping your supervisors understand that they need to see the whole person in each of their employees, not just the worker, Mickelson said. That includes awareness of both the physical and the mental.

For example, if supervisors recognize when employees who are in safety-sensitive jobs are distracted or fatigued, they can consider moving them to less dangerous roles for the day.

“It’s really about being tuned in to your employees,” Mickelson said.

In many cases, simply asking your employees what you could do to better support their well-being is a great place to start.

Know that whichever steps you choose to take as an organ­ization, letting employees know that you care about them will pay dividends for your organization and your workforce.

7 things employers should know about independent medical examinations

Sometimes during the course of treatment for a work injury, a claims representative will decide to request an independent opinion from another physician.

This can help in making determinations such as whether:

  • The injury is work-related
  • The employee could go back to work without or with fewer medical restrictions
  • The employee is getting the right medical treatment
  • The employee needs surgery

For example, an employee has already undergone two unsuccessful back surgeries and requests a third one, or an employee with arthritis claims that work aggravated the condition, causing the need for a total knee replacement.

In cases like these, a workers’ compensation insurer might pay an independent doctor to review the employee’s medical history, conduct a physical exam and give an opinion that can be used in a hearing. These are referred to as “independent medical examinations” in most states. There are states that don’t have independent exams, however, such as Iowa where employers choose the treating doctor.

Here are a few things you should know about independent medical examinations:

  • Timing is everything
    If we arrange for the examination too soon, the doctor might conclude that more time is needed to determine whether the present course of treatment is working. This typically isn’t a desired outcome, since usually one goal of requesting the independent examination is to gain support for a change in the course of treatment.
  • They’re expensive
    One examination can cost from $2,000-$12,000. For some injuries, examinations by multiple specialists might be necessary. For example, a head injury might require examinations from a neurologist, ophthalmologist, psychiatrist and other specialists.
  • The conclusion isn’t always favorable
    Of course, when requesting an independent medical examination, the claims representative is hoping it supports the employer’s case, but it’s not uncommon for the results to come back otherwise. Even though the insurance company is paying for the examination, it’s understood that the doctor is to give an honest opinion.
  • They’re not final
    Even if the doctor’s opinion seems favorable, it’s only one factor that will be considered by the judge in a litigated workers’ compensation claim. The judge will also consider the treating doctor’s opinion, any other medical opinions the employee has sought out, and the employee’s own statements.
  • Choice of doctor is critical
    A judge can decide to throw out the results of an independent medical examination entirely if he or she believes an opposing opinion, such as that of the treating doctor, is more credible. Because of this, it’s important to choose a high-quality doctor who will provide a credible opinion backed up by the facts of the claim.
  • They’re perceived as adversarial by employees
    If an employee hasn’t yet retained an attorney, a request for an independent medical examination may compel the employee to do so. If the independent examination recommendations are counter to how the employee has been comfortable being treated, the likelihood of getting an attorney involved increases.
  • They’re not the only option
    There are other ways to learn more about an employee’s medical condition, such as writing a letter to the treating doctor, or asking that the employee get a second opinion from a doctor of his or her choice. Another option in some states, including Minnesota, is to get a neutral evaluation in which the judge chooses a doctor to do the examination.

There is a lot to consider when requesting an independent medical examination, and SFM has doctors and attorneys on staff who provide advice when claims reach this point. Independent medical examinations typically aren’t necessary, but they can be useful tools.

This is not intended to serve as legal advice for individual fact-specific legal cases or as a legal basis for your employment practices.

SFM Foundation golf outing named top local charity tournament

Minneapolis/St. Paul Business Journal ranked SFM Foundation’s annual Golfing for Scholarships event #8 of the metro area’s top 25 charity tournaments in 2019.

Tournaments were ranked based on their 2019 gross revenue. SFM Foundation’s gross revenue came in at $247,749. All proceeds of the event go toward the Foundation’s scholarship fund.

“We are absolutely thrilled that our golf event has grown into a quarter million dollar fundraiser and has been recognized alongside such exceptional Twin Cities charitable organizations,” said SFM Foundation President Linda Williams. “The number of families we’ve helped far exceeds what we originally dreamed of when we gave out our first scholarships in 2009. We are so thankful to our sponsors and donors who made this possible.”

Business Journal subscribers can view the full list online .

View more news about SFM

css.php