Expert claim handling lets agents rest easy

As an agent, you know you can rest easy when one of your customers has a workers’ compensation claim being handled by SFM.

Our unique combination of effort, expertise and empathy allows us to provide the superior service that our customers and their employees rely on.

As a monoline carrier solely focused on workers’ compensation, we’re able to offer specialized service that’s tough to match.

Experienced claim adjusters and team-based approach

Our claim adjusters average 10 years of tenure with SFM, and many had prior experience before working here.

They’re highly skilled in guiding injured workers through challenging times and helping them regain their health and productivity. They also support policyholders as they navigate their role in the workers’ compensation claim process.

When they encounter a difficult claim, our claim representatives have a variety of resources available to them including doctors, nurses, claim technical specialists and workers’ compensation attorneys.

Experienced claim representatives often say our rich support structure, and lower-than-average caseloads set us apart from other carriers.

Another differentiator is our team-based approach. SFM claim representatives work as part of cross-functional teams including underwriters, nurse case managers and loss prevention representatives, allowing them to provide holistic service to their customers. For example, a claim representative may provide insights to a loss prevention team member, who can then work with the policyholder to prevent similar injuries in the future.

Enhancing the customer experience of our injured workers is a key focus area for us as well. For example, workers can speak with specially trained nurses when they report through our SFM Work Injury Hotline, and they can access their claim and payment information 24/7 through our online portal.

We are not only proud of the significant tenure of our experienced claim representatives, but we’re also investing in the future of our claim operations through a claims training program this summer. At SFM, we are continually working to ensure we maintain our high level of claim handling for years to come.

Medical cost containment and better outcomes

We help employers keep their claim costs, and resulting premium increases, under control in a variety of ways, including:

  • In-house medical bill review — ensures bills are within state guidelines and reflect services delivered
  • In-house special investigations unit — investigates potential fraudulent claims and makes subrogation recoveries
  • In-house prescription drug clinical review nurse — monitors prescriptions closely to identify signs of addiction and cost containment opportunities
  • Pharmacy benefit manager — provides best pricing for prescription drugs

Our in-house doctors and nurses help make sure injured workers are getting the most effective treatments for their injuries, improving the chances of reaching the best possible outcomes for the employees.

Claim service support in growth states

Over time, SFM has established claim handling expertise in a growing number of states. We have teams based in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa and Nebraska. Claims in these states and South Dakota are all handled by our in-house claims representatives.

Claims from other states are handled by Gallagher Basset with oversight by SFM’s claims technical team. Our claims technical specialists pay special attention to claims originating in these states and they can assist agents and policyholders when needed.

Service you can count on

No employee or employer wants to deal with a work injury, but when injuries occur, our skilled and compassionate SFM claim staff is here to offer the expertise and support needed to reach the best resolution possible for everyone involved.

For more information on SFM’s services, contact your SFM underwriter.

 

View more Agent Agenda articles

Get to know an SFM underwriter: Rick Spaulding

 

Wisconsin-based Marketing Underwriter Specialist Rick Spaulding has worked at SFM for nine years, and in the insurance industry for 16 years. We asked Rick a few questions about his role and his background.

Rick Spaulding
Rick Spaulding

What was your first job in the insurance industry?

Back in 2006, I was hired by another insurance carrier as an underwriting trainee. I sometimes look back and wonder where I would be today had I not gotten that job — probably not in the insurance world. It is just kind of neat how one little decision can really affect the rest of your life.

How would you describe your role at SFM?

It’s a little bit more complicated than a traditional underwriter because we are marketing underwriters here at SFM — so it’s a dual role. As an underwriter, I assess risk by determining insurability and then pricing. The other side of it, which is the side I think I gravitate toward and enjoy the most, is developing relationships with independent agents. When you work with somebody who you’ve gotten to know over the years and you help them succeed, and they help you succeed, and then we see our policyholders succeed by experiencing favorable loss experience, it just gives me a feeling that I’m having an impact.

How is SFM different from other carriers that you’ve worked with?

I’ve worked with other carriers both as an employee and an independent insurance agent. I would say that SFM stands out the most from other carriers in our service level. We’re a lot more hands-on than most. The fact we’re in a dual role as marketing underwriters is also unique in the field. Being a marketing underwriter at SFM, I’m able to not only develop those relationships and make promises, I’m able to fulfill those promises and follow through with what I say I’m going to do.

Is there a time that stands out to you when your job was particularly rewarding?

This past year when a survey from one of our agent partners showed us among their top preferred carriers, that was very rewarding. It was really a testament to the hard work we’ve been putting in over the last decade. To see those survey results just praising how much they love working with our claims department, our loss prevention department, and working with me on renewals and new business just made me feel really good about all of the hard work that we’ve put in.

On a related note, we’re part of the Wisconsin Assisted Living Association, and when we’re at their annual conference, numerous policyholders come up to us and thank us for what we do. They mention all the loss prevention services we provide them and how well our claim reps handled certain claims, and just really express how much they enjoy working with us. That’s a really, really neat experience to see coming from the customer.

What do you like most about your job?

I love having the ability to make decisions. I’ve worked myself to a point now where my manager trusts the decisions that I make, and I trust him as well, and we have open communication.

Tell us a little bit about yourself.

I kind of have a crazy household. There are six of us – including four kids, so it makes for interesting and fun times. We’re constantly busy doing sports and being involved with the school. My unique hobby that I’ve taken up in the last year is Brazilian jiujitsu, and it has really just given me something to push myself outside of my comfort zone.

 

View more news about SFM

Wisconsin law changes impact part-time workers, PPD benefits

A number of changes to the Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act were signed into law in April.

One significant change affects the way wage-loss benefits are calculated for part-time workers — employees who work fewer than 35 hours per week.

Under the new law, these workers’ hours will be expanded to 40 hours per week for the purpose of calculating wages if they are also employed by another employer, or they have worked part-time for less than 12 months before the date of injury. An employer can rebut this wage expansion if they can show proof that the employee chose to restrict their hours to part-time.

For other part-time workers, the average weekly wage will be calculated as the greater of:

  • The actual average weekly earnings for the prior 52 calendar weeks prior to the injury, excepting any weeks they didn’t work, or
  • Their hourly rate at the time of injury multiplied by the hours they were scheduled to work that week

Other changes signed into law in April include:

  • An employee who is undergoing an independent medical examination required by an employer and workers’ compensation insurer may now have an observer present at the exam.
  • The maximum weekly permanent partial disability benefit increased from $362 to $415 for injuries occurring on or after April 10, 2022. It will increase again to $430 for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2023. This is the first increase in the rate since 2017.

 

View more Agent Agenda articles

Iowa Supreme Court defines ‘shoulder’ in rotator cuff injury case

On April 1, 2022, the Iowa Supreme Court affirmed a district court’s finding in Chavez v. MS Technology LLC/Westfield Insurance Co. that an employee’s injury was a scheduled member injury to her shoulder rather than an unscheduled whole-body injury, agreeing that the definition of “shoulder” should not just be limited to the joint.

In 2018, Rosa Chavez filed a workers’ compensation claim seeking permanent partial disability benefits after she claimed to have suffered a shoulder injury while wringing out a mop at work for MS Technology.

An independent medical examination found that Chavez sustained an acute injury to her right shoulder that included the rotator cuff, tendons and cartilage around the shoulder joint and the attached muscles. Court records indicate Chavez underwent corrective surgery to repair the damage. The independent medical examination also found that the employee was at maximum medical improvement at the time of examination, and she had a 10% upper extremity impairment, which was equal to a 6% impairment of the whole body. Permanent partial disability benefits are generally higher for unscheduled whole-body injuries.

Chavez’s attorney argued that her injury should be classified as whole-body since her symptoms and impairment extend beyond the shoulder joint, and she should be awarded permanent partial disability benefits based on an unscheduled whole-body injury.

Under Iowa workers’ compensation law, the classification of a claimant’s injury as either scheduled or unscheduled determines the extent of the claimant’s entitlement to permanent partial disability benefits.

After several appeals, the case was brought before the Iowa Supreme Court, which upheld the district court’s finding that the employee’s impairment was only to the upper extremity, awarding Chavez permanent partial disability compensation benefits for a scheduled member injury.

This case further interpreted what constitutes a “shoulder” in light of the 2017 amendments to Iowa Code 85.34, sub. 2, that identify the “shoulder” as a scheduled member when classified for workers’ compensation benefits.

You can read the full court decision here .

 

View more Agent Agenda articles

Minnesota Supreme Court upholds benefits award in hearing loss case

On May 16, 2022, the Minnesota Supreme Court upheld an award of workers’ compensation benefits to an employee for his hearing loss due to long-term exposure to noise over a 30-year period working for five employers.

In Sershen v. Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Supreme Court found that Dennis Sershen had suffered occupational hearing loss during his time working in manufacturing. He worked in various roles in manufacturing starting in 1986, in which he claimed he was regularly exposed to hazardous noise levels on the job. He reported his hearing loss began around 1994, requiring him to wear hearing aids.

Following his retirement in 2017, Sershen filed a workers’ compensation claim for medical benefits for hearing loss and permanent partial disability against his five past manufacturing employers – Streater Inc., Truth Hardware Corp, SPX Corp, ATEK Cos. and his most recent employer, the Metropolitan Council.

Sershen then settled his claims against SPX and ATEK on a Pierringer basis prior to the hearing, with the two companies paying lump sums to the employee to be released from the litigation and making it so that neither the employee nor the other employers and their insurers could later collect from them.

At the hearing, the compensation judge ordered Sershen’s last employer, the Metropolitan Council, to pay his medical benefits, citing Minnesota Statute 176.135, subd. 5, which assigns liability to the employer and insurer on the date of the last exposure to the hazard. The judge found that Sershen’s last exposure to a noisy environment was at the Metropolitan Council and his last significant exposure was at SPX. The judge did not make any findings on whether the employee had sustained a disablement and was owed permanent partial disability, instead declaring the issue moot.

The Metropolitan Council appealed the judge’s decision and the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) affirmed. The WCCA also clarified that the permanent partial disability issue was moot because of the Pierringer settlement between Sershen and two previous employers, one of which was SPX, which was found to be Sershen’s last significant exposure and a contributing factor to his hearing loss.

The Metropolitan Council appealed again, and the Minnesota Supreme Court once again affirmed that under Minnesota Statute 176.135, subd. 5, the Metropolitan Council was liable for paying the medical expenses as it was the last exposure, regardless of whether that exposure was significant. The Minnesota Supreme Court then remanded the case to the hearing court to determine whether Sershen sustained a disablement and is therefore owed permanent partial disability benefits.

The Minnesota Supreme Court explained that if disablement is found, then under Minnesota Statute 176.66 the Metropolitan Council will be able to seek reimbursement for medical benefits paid to Sershen from the employer deemed the last significant exposure to the employee’s hearing loss, SPX. However, since SPX settled on a Pierringer basis, the employee would then have to reimburse the Metropolitan Council if disablement is found.

The Minnesota Supreme Court reasoned this approach matches the legislative intent which allows the employee to timely collect benefits while the employers and insurers parse out liability for the last significant exposure.

You can read the full court decision here .

 

View more Agent Agenda articles

Policyholders give premium audit experience high marks

Policyholders continue to give SFM’s premium audit experience high marks in follow-up surveys.

For 2021, ratings from policyholders who completed online or mail-in audits averaged 4.1 out of 5, and ratings from those who had physical audits averaged 4.6 out of 5.

“We take pride in the high ratings and positive comments we get from policyholders on our premium audit process,” said Premium Audit Team Leader DeAnne Misgen. “We’re continually striving to provide excellent service and add convenience for our customers.”

 

View more Agent Agenda articles

SFM Foundation holds fundraisers, new scholarships awarded

The SFM Foundation started out in 2008, with a mission to ease the burdens on families affected by workplace accidents. Fourteen years and $3 million later, SFM Foundation scholarships are changing lives by making college possible for students in need.

In May, the Foundation’s annual Iowa golf event saw record turnout and received rave reviews from participants. The Foundation’s Minnesota golf outing in June has become one of the largest charity golf tournaments in the state, and this year’s event did not disappoint! These annual Golfing for Scholarships tournaments are the primary source of fundraising for the scholarship fund, and SFM’s agency partners have played play a key role since the very beginning.

Since its inception in 2008, the Foundation’s scholarship program has helped 216 students, including the 13 new recipients announced this summer. Generous support from event sponsors and donors over the years has allowed the Foundation to grant scholarships totaling more than $3.2 million.

The SFM Foundation provides scholarships for students whose parents were seriously injured or killed while working for Minnesota or Iowa employers. SFM Foundation is an affiliate of Kids’ Chance of America  in Iowa and Minnesota and is also known as Kids’ Chance of Iowa. To learn more about the cause, visit sfmfoundation.com .

 

View more Agent Agenda articles

SFM employees connect with college students

A number of SFM employees took time recently to talk with students about issues in insurance, and careers in the field.

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Amanda Aponte presented to University of St. Thomas actuarial students on how COVID-19 has impacted the property casualty industry.

Internal Premium Auditor Toni Dvorak spoke as a panelist at the University of St. Thomas Dougherty Family College, sharing with students pursuing associate degrees in liberal arts. She talked about her experience working in the industry and gave advice on how to prepare for a job in insurance.

Loss Prevention Technical Leader Lee Wendel gave a guest lecture at the University of Minnesota’s Carlson School of Business attended by actuarial and business students in the school’s insurance program. He talked about how leadership can impact major loss sources for employee injuries, and how technology is impacting safety over time.

 

View more Agent Agenda articles

Talking about safety: Techniques for effective safety training and communication

A strong safety culture starts with a high level of safety awareness among your employees. Getting there requires consistent, effective communication between leadership and front-line workers.

When leaders communicate to employees about safety, start by explaining why it’s important to your organization — that leadership cares about its employees, and your culture is one where coworkers care about each other.

“The employees don’t care what you know until they know that you care about them personally,” said SFM Loss Prevention Specialist Steve Lichtenberg. “Lead with passion and build a rapport with the employees.”

Tips for high-impact safety training

Newer employees are at the highest risk for injuries, so it’s important to start providing safety training right away with new employee orientation. After that, plan on regular check-ins and recurring training throughout that first year and continuing throughout employment.

For ongoing safety training, it can be helpful to create a training topic checklist to follow throughout the year. To get a complete picture of the hazard exposures employees have, the training schedule should include compliance, high hazards, loss trends and near miss and incident-only reporting.

If possible, try to offer training frequently in smaller segments, as employees tend to lose focus over long sessions.

Variety is key with recurring training to keep staff engaged and help boost understanding, and that the educational method used to train can have an impact on the effectiveness of each training session, according to SFM Senior Loss Prevention Representative Sara Cooper.

Safety training methods from most to least effective

Our safety professionals ranked common safety training methods from most to least effective in terms of employee understanding and retention. It’s important to note that everyone learns differently, and so it’s best to use a variety of the listed methods.

  1. On the job training: Employees first hear, then see, then do
  2. Train the trainer: Being trained to teach someone else
  3. Job shadowing: Learning from a fellow employee
  4. Toolbox talks: Leading short safety talks regularly
  5. Computer-based training: While efficient, employee can’t ask questions
  6. Lecture: Good for relaying a small amount of information to a large group

Techniques for safety conversations

Formal safety training is important, but it’s also important to try to work conversations about safety in throughout the workday. It may take some practice at first, so it pays to be intentional.

SFM Loss Prevention Specialist Mike Fetting recommends a few types of safety conversations to have on a regular basis:

  • The walk around conversation – In this conversation an employee and supervisor might talk about the employee’s goals and plans for safety. The supervisor could also ask the employee what safety measures the organization does well and what needs improving.
  • The safety feedback conversation – These can be quick compliments to an employee on a job well done with a follow up question about how the employee made it happen.
  • The why I care about safety conversation – This tends to be very personal. Some examples include an employee’s past work experience, a family member’s safety experience, or simply that the individual cares about their coworkers.
  • Modified Gemba Walk – Drawing on a Lean management philosophy technique, this conversation starts by visiting an employee at their workstation and trying to learn a task. That can be done by watching them do the work, asking questions about how the task is done, and if a potential hazard is identified, asking the individual why they do the task that way. The idea here is that a safety manager or supervisor can better understand the job and process if they interact with the employee and try to see things from their perspective.

During your conversations, be sure to take the opportunity to learn from your employee.

“When it comes to safety conversations with employees, listening more and talking less can sometimes be the best approach,” Fetting said.

Encourage employee feedback

Communication is a two-way street and getting feedback from employees at all levels of the company is an important part of an effective safety program. Encouraging safety feedback starts with trust. Employees need to be able to trust leadership to act on feedback they provide, and they need to trust their coworkers to speak up when they observe safety concerns.

Safety leaders can encourage employee feedback by:

  • Promoting hazard reporting
  • Implementing near miss reporting
  • Adding a suggestion box for indirect feedback
  • Making it safe to speak up (no negative repercussions for reporting hazards or unsafe behaviors)

Once an employee provides feedback, follow up in several ways:

  • Thank the employee for their feedback and acknowledge their concern
  • Work to understand the situation better by going back to the employee and getting more information
  • Investigate quickly
  • Provide timely assessments or answers for every report or suggestion, regardless of whether you were able to make changes
  • Share any safety changes made with the company by email or newsletter and celebrate the successful use of the reporting process
  • Reward the employee for their effort

Safety training and communication play a fundamental role in a successful loss prevention program. To get safety resources and learn more about building a loss prevention program visit the safety page on sfmic.com or reach out to your SFM loss prevention representative.

You can also learn more by viewing the full Loss Prevention 101 webinar at sfmic.com/webinars.

css.php