Workers’ compensation exemptions for Minnesota small business owners and family members

Generally speaking, Minnesota law requires employers to provide workers’ compensation coverage for all employees.

But the law does allow employers to exclude certain types of employees from coverage, such as small business owners and their close relatives.

Following are the types of employees that are exempt from mandatory insurance coverage by Minnesota state law :

  • Sole proprietorships and partnerships:
    Someone operating a business as a sole proprietor isn’t required to get workers’ compensation insurance for his or her spouse, parents or children working in the business, regardless of age or wage rate. However, the business owner would have to provide coverage for any other employees. Similarly, members of a partnership — such as a law firm — don’t have to purchase coverage for themselves. If their spouses, parents or children are employed by the partnership, they’re not required to provide coverage for them either.
  • Executive officers of a closely held corporation:
    A closely held corporation is one in which the capital stock is held by no more than 10 people and has had less than 22,880 hours of payroll in the preceding calendar year (January 1 to December 31). Executive officers of closely held corporations can be excluded from coverage if they are elected or appointed in accordance with the company’s charter or bylaws and they own at least 25 percent of the capital stock of the corporation (exclusive of any stock owned by other family members). If executive officers qualify to be excluded from workers’ compensation coverage, their spouses, parents and children are also excluded if they work in the same business. Relatives within the third degree of kinship — such as uncles, nieces, siblings and grandchildren — can also be excluded, but to do so, the employer must file a written election with the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry.
  • Managers of limited liability corporations:
    A limited liability company (LLC) has some attributes of a corporation and others of a partnership. If an LLC has 10 or fewer members and has less than 22,880 hours of payroll in the preceding calendar year (January 1 to December 31) managers who own at least a 25 percent membership interest aren’t required to purchase workers’ compensation coverage for themselves. If managers qualify to be excluded from workers’ compensation coverage, their spouses, parents and children are also excluded if they work in the same business. As with executive officers, relatives of a manager within the third degree of kinship can also be excluded, but to do so, the employer must file a written election with the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry.

Even if state law doesn’t require workers’ compensation coverage for certain individuals, a business can choose to cover them by notifying its workers’ compensation insurer in writing.

If you find that you do need workers’ compensation insurance, you can get a quote through our website.

If you’re considering whether you should get workers’ compensation insurance for yourself or someone who isn’t required to have coverage, check out the small business owners blog post on our WorkersCompEssentials website.

This is not intended to serve as legal advice for individual fact-specific legal cases or as a legal basis for your employment practices.

“Ban the Box” doesn’t prevent criminal background check

During the hiring process, there are many tools you can use to ensure you get the best possible candidate. In some cases, one of these tools is a criminal background check. But before you can ask applicants about their criminal history, there are a few stipulations to keep in mind.

“Ban the box” is a national movement , with over 30 states as well as many cities and counties enacting laws governing the issue. Minnesota is one of nine states with a law that makes it unlawful for both public and private employers to ask on application forms whether job candidates have criminal histories. Nebraska and Wisconsin have similar laws for public employers only. Iowa and South Dakota have no ban the box law for either public or private employers.

The law doesn’t prevent employers from asking whether applicants have a criminal history, but it requires that they wait until a job interview to do so. In cases where the company doesn’t conduct interviews, they can’t ask about criminal histories until they extend a conditional offer of employment.

Typically, employers are still allowed to conduct a criminal background check and exclude applicants if a crime is relevant to the job duties, or if otherwise required by law.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission lays out three factors  to help analyze whether criminal conduct is relevant to a job:

  • The nature and gravity of the offense

The harm caused by the crime and the elements that went into perpetrating the crime such as deception or intimidation.

  • The time that has passed since the offense and/or completion of the sentence

The EEOC doesn’t lay out a specific timeframe, but notes that the risk of recidivism can decline over time.

  • The nature of the job held or sought

The job duties, performance circumstances (level of supervision, interaction with vulnerable individuals, etc.) and environment (outside, in a school, etc.).

Pre-employment criminal background checks can be an important tool in certain industries and types of jobs. Use them as part of your hiring process when appropriate, but consult with your employment attorney first.

Other hiring considerations

There are many other tools to consider including in your hiring process:

  • Drug and alcohol testing

Especially in trades where drug and alcohol use correlates with increased work injuries, consider making job offers contingent on drug testing. Consult with your employment attorney before starting a testing program.

  • Pre-employment physicals

You can conduct a pre-employment physical after making a conditional job offer as long as you require it of all applicants in the same category and only tests for essential job-related capabilities. Consult with an attorney if you decide to withdraw an offer.

  • College degree verification

Consider calling schools to verify educational credentials.

  • Driving record check

Checking an applicant’s driving record when driving is a job requirement can reveal red flags such as DUI convictions or driving without a license. Motor vehicle records are available through your state’s licensing department.

  • Reference checks

In Minnesota, you might find that reference checks are more fruitful now. Statutory changes in Minn. Stat. Sec. 181.967 relieved employers of liability when giving certain reference information in good faith.

  • Social Security numbers

Make employment contingent on verification of eligibility to work in the United States. E-Verify is a voluntary system (except for certain employers with federal contracts, where it is mandatory) operated by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that enables you to check free of charge. If undocumented workers are injured, their employer could potentially pay benefits for years because they will not be allowed to return to work.

A thorough hiring process can prevent costly workers’ compensation claims, and resulting increases in premiums. It’s worth doing your due diligence early so that a new hire doesn’t become a problem employee.

This is not intended to serve as legal advice for individual fact-specific legal cases or as a legal basis for your employment practices.

What the ‘gig economy’ means for worker protections

By Brian Bent
SFM Vice President, Director of Underwriting

You may know you can use your smartphone to hail a ride to the airport. But did you know you can also use an app to find someone to come fix your car, clean your house or even cook you dinner?

These roving drivers, mechanics, housecleaners and cooks are part of what’s referred to as the “gig economy.” Technology allows them to connect with customers directly, which means they can work independently on a job-by-job basis, rather than through an employer.

This fast-growing work arrangement creates new questions about state laws regarding employer/employee relationships, and who will bear the burden of the cost if a gig worker is hurt on the job.

‘Gig economy’ growing fast

A survey conducted by the Federal Reserve Board showed that 36 percent of American adults engaged in some kind of “informal paid work activity” either as a primary or supplemental income source.

From 2005 to 2015, the percentage of American workers engaged in alternative work arrangements, including temporary, independent, contract or freelance work, rose from 10.7 percent to 15.8 percent according to the National Bureau of Economic Research .

Some workers choose this kind of arrangement for the freedom and flexibility. Others just need the extra money, or do it reluctantly because it’s the only type of work they can find.

Digital platforms account for some of the growth, but a larger portion is due to companies increasingly opting to hire workers as contractors rather than permanent employees, according to a 2016 study by Lawrence Katz and Alan Krueger .

Arrangement creates a gap in worker protection

Many of the laws and benefits established to protect workers, including workers’ compensation, are contingent on an employer/employee relationship.

This means gig economy workers might not have those protections unless they choose to purchase them at their own expense. For example, a driver considered an employee of a commercial delivery company is entitled to employer-paid workers’ compensation coverage by law, but a ride-hailing app driver is not in most states. So, if the delivery driver gets in an accident on the job, the medical costs and lost wages would be covered. Ride-hailing drivers would have no such protection, unless they had previously purchased their own coverage.

As our economy and approach to work evolves, it’s important that our laws keep up so we maintain established worker protections.

The gap goes beyond workers’ compensation — medical benefits, retirement benefits and unemployment insurance are all often contingent upon being legally defined as an employee.

Public and private sectors looking at ways to close the gap

Lawmakers, agencies and the companies that run digital platforms are starting to look at ways gig workers can receive the same protections as traditional employees.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has made it a priority to address fair employment practices in the gig economy, according to national employment law firm Littler .

A U.S. Senate committee held a hearing this year on providing retirement benefits for independent workers.

Some state and federal lawmakers have made proposals to provide portable benefits workers could keep while moving from job to job. The State of New York already has a requirement that ride-sharing platforms Uber and Lyft cover workers’ compensation for their drivers.

Uber is piloting a program in other states to provide some medical and wage-replacement benefits to drivers who are injured on the job. It’s a voluntary program
paid for by the drivers, and the benefits are more limited than those provided by workers’ compensation law.

It doesn’t seem there’s any clear, universal solution in sight yet to these lacking worker protections, but it’s encouraging to see that lawmakers and large companies recognize the problem and are trying to find ways to fix it.

As our economy and approach to work evolves, it’s important that our laws keep up so we maintain established worker protections.

In the meantime, if you use the services of those in the gig economy, it’s important to understand your employment relationship and do what you can to protect yourself from liability.

Are your workers independent contractors or employees?

As an employer, you have different requirements for how you must treat workers considered employees, and those considered independent contractors.

From a workers’ compensation perspective, you are required to provide coverage for lost wages and medical costs due to work injuries for an employee, but not an independent contractor.

It’s important to know whether those who do work for you are considered employees or independent contractors under the law. It’s not always simple to determine.

IRS and workers’ compensation laws can define independent contractors differently

Don’t assume that someone considered an independent contractor for tax purposes is automatically considered one for workers’ compensation purposes.

The Internal Revenue Service may have different criteria than your state for establishing whether a worker can be considered an independent contractor versus an employee.

Every state is different, but in most states, for a worker to be considered an independent contractor for workers’ compensation purposes, the worker must have:

  • Control over how the work is performed
  • Ability to realize financial loss or gain based on how a project goes
  • Ownership of equipment to complete the job
  • Compensation on a per-job basis

These are just some basic criteria, and most states have additional requirements beyond these. Get details through your state’s department of labor. For example, the labor departments in Minnesota , Wisconsin and Iowa provide additional information online.

Tips for working with independent contractors

If you hire a subcontractor that lacks the proper workers’ compensation coverage, or doesn’t qualify as an independent contractor, it could put you at risk for liability if a work injury occurs, depending on which state the work is being performed in.

Here are some tips to avoid this situation, where applicable:

  • Confirm that the subcontractor is an independent contractor as defined by your state’s laws.
  • If the subcontractor uses employees, ask for a certificate of insurance as proof of workers’ compensation coverage.

Subcontractors with no employees can choose whether to purchase workers’ compensation insurance for themselves in most states. If they do have coverage, ask for a certificate of insurance for verification. Note that certificate of insurance verification alone does not qualify a subcontractor as an independent contractor. They still must meet all of the state’s criteria.

If they don’t have coverage: Request a copy of the subcontractor’s independent contractor registration form if applicable in your state. Some states have a registration process for independent contractors, and some don’t. Otherwise, ask for a copy of the subcontractor’s current license.

Note that a contractor registration form alone does not qualify a subcontractor as an independent contractor. You should also:

  • Check to see that the subcontractor is registered with the state as a business entity.
  • Request a Certificate of Insurance for General Liability covering the dates the work was performed with limits of at least $300,000.

Your agent can help

If you need help determining whether a subcontractor is an independent contractor or employee, don’t hesitate to ask your agent for help. This way, you’ll understand the implications for your workers’ compensation premium right away, rather than finding out you owe more than expected at the time of your premium audit.

Wisconsin law makes workers’ compensation ‘exclusive remedy’ for temp worker injuries

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker signed a bill into law on February 28 that prevents temporary employees who sustain work injuries from suing their employers, rather than going through workers’ compensation.

The workers’ compensation system has traditionally been considered the “exclusive remedy” to cover medical expenses and lost wages due to work injuries; however, a recent court ruling in Wisconsin called that into question.

A January 9 Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision  stated that the estate of a temporary employee who was fatally injured on the job could sue the temporary employer, since the estate had not made a workers’ compensation claim.

The new law, Act 139 , overturns this decision going forward, according to Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce.

Are injuries at a work holiday party compensable?

The approach of the holiday season means it’s time for baking, decorating the house and visits from family. It also means that many workplaces host holiday parties. But what happens when an employee at a work party is injured? In some cases, the injury may be compensable through workers’ compensation.

According to Minnesota law, injuries that occur during voluntary work events are typically not compensable. Statute 176.021.subd.9 states:

Injuries incurred while participating in voluntary recreational programs sponsored by the employer, including health promotion programs, athletic events, parties, and picnics, do not arise out of and in the course of employment even though the employer pays some or all of the cost of the program. This exclusion does not apply in the event that the injured employee was ordered or assigned by the employer to participate in the program.

Exceptions to the rule

Although in most cases the injury would not be compensable, there are some exceptions. The statute applies only if the event is completely voluntary, there is no punishment for not attending and the event does not benefit the employer.

An injury could potentially be compensable under one of these circumstances:

  • The event was optional, but those who didn’t attend had to remain at work
  • There was coercion to attend the event
  • The event was promotional or marketable in a way that benefited the employer
  • Employees at the event were working, even if it was optional
  • Clients are present and employees are furthering the employer’s business
  • Although there is no requirement, there are expectations that everyone attends, with potential consequences for those who do not
  • Employees who attended the event were paid or rewarded for doing so

If a work party is taking place on work premises, injuries are more likely to be compensable than those that happen at other locations.

Even for a fun event like a holiday party, don’t let down your guard about safety hazards to your employees. It would be unfortunate if something intended to be enjoyable ended in someone getting hurt.

This is not intended to serve as legal advice for individual fact-specific legal cases or as a legal basis for your employment practices.

Do volunteers qualify for workers’ compensation?

Generally, to qualify for workers’ compensation benefits, a person must be established as an employee by receiving some form of payment from the employer for his or her services.

So, when someone is injured while volunteering, they’re usually not eligible for workers’ compensation benefits, but there are exceptions. For example, volunteers who are paid in kind or who fall into particular classes specifically mentioned in state law can be considered employees.

Non-monetary compensation

Someone who is being paid in kind for their services — through free meals from a restaurant or reduced rent from a landlord, for example — could be considered an employee if the parties had entered into an agreement about compensation. There must be some intent to enter into this relationship — receipt of a mere tip or gift doesn’t make someone an employee.

Protected classes of volunteers

In some cases, state law defines certain classes of volunteers as employees for the purposes of workers’ compensation.

Minnesota law  defines the following types of volunteers as employees:

  • Volunteers working in state institutions, such as correctional facilities, under the supervision of the commissioner of Human Services or the commissioner of Corrections.
  • Volunteers participating in programs established by local social service agencies , such as a county health and human services department. In this case, “local social services agency” means any agency established under Minn. Statutes section 393.01 , with each county in the state typically having a social services agency that includes the board of county commissioners.
  • Volunteers in the building and construction industry who are working for joint labor-management nonprofit community service projects.
  • Volunteers serving at a Minnesota veterans home.
  • Volunteer ambulance drivers and attendants.
  • Volunteer first responders (such as firefighters).

Wisconsin law also includes certain volunteers in its definition of employees, including:

  • Members of volunteer fire squads, rescue squads or diving teams.
  • Students in a technical college who, as part of their training, perform services or produce products for which the school collects a fee or who produce a product that is sold by the school.
  • Public or private school students performing services as part of school work training, work experience or work study program, if certain conditions are met.
  • Employees, volunteers or members of emergency management units and certain regional emergency response teams.

Good Samaritans

So-called Good Samaritans are almost always ineligible for workers’ compensation benefits because there’s typically no intent to establish an employment relationship and they’re not usually compensated for their services. For example, in a 1969 Minnesota case (Huebner v. Farmers Co-op)  where a tractor driver was seriously injured while helping a grain elevator operator who had asked for assistance, the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that the driver wasn’t eligible for workers’ compensation.

Things to consider when using volunteers

Since volunteers typically aren’t entitled to workers’ compensation benefits, organizations should think about the likelihood of an injury, and the potential legal and financial consequences if one occurs. If an injured volunteer files a lawsuit, who will pay the damages?  Will a general liability or some other insurance policy defend against the claim and pay resulting damages?  An employer’s potential liability may well exceed the value of the volunteer’s services.

For more information, see our Volunteers in the Workplace Legal Advisory – Minnesota and Volunteers in the Workplace Legal Advisory – Wisconsin .

This is not intended to serve as legal advice for individual fact-specific legal cases or as a legal basis for your employment practices.

What Iowa’s new workers’ compensation changes mean

Iowa’s workers’ compensation system will see some significant changes on July 1, under a bill signed into law by Gov. Terry Branstad in March.

Following are the changes employers are most likely to notice:

  • Pre-existing conditions
    Employers will now only be liable for the portion of an employee disability related directly to an injury that occurred at their organization. This is referred to as “apportionment,” and it prevents the employer from being held liable for portions of a disability caused by work injuries at previous employers or other pre-existing injuries.
  • Shoulder injuries
    The law provides for retraining at community colleges for certain employees who cannot return to employment due to shoulder injuries. It also adds the shoulder as a scheduled body member, meaning the amount of compensation due an employee who sustains a work-related shoulder injury is spelled out by law.
  • Intoxication
    If an employee tests positive for drugs or alcohol at the time of a work injury or immediately after, the burden of proof will be on the employee to show that he or she was not intoxicated at the time of the injury.
  • Notice of injury
    In order to receive workers’ compensation benefits, the law will require injured employees to notify their employers within 90 days from the date they are injured, which the law defines as the date they “knew or should have known that the injury was work-related.”
  • Interest rates
    Interest rates on workers’ compensation awards will change from a fixed 10 percent to the Federal Reserve’s one-year treasury constant plus 2 percent.
  • Permanent partial disability
    Under the new law, permanent partial disability payments won’t be made until the injured employee reaches maximum medical improvement, and doctors’ permanency ratings will be based on American Medical Association guidelines. Currently, payments are made prior to maximum medical improvements, and so the ratings are estimates.

One of the more controversial provisions of the bill was ultimately dropped — a provision that would have cut off permanent total disability payments at age 67.

Photo of Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad by Rich Koele / Shutterstock.com

This is not intended to serve as legal advice for individual fact-specific legal cases or as a legal basis for your employment practices.

Wisconsin medical board adopts opioid prescribing guidelines

The Wisconsin Medical Examining Board adopted new guidelines for prescribing opioid painkillers aimed at combating heroin use, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

According to the article, the guidelines include:

  • Treating pain through other methods before prescribing opioids
  • Prescribing the drugs in the lowest dose possible
  • Issuing multiple prescriptions with specific refill dates rather than one larger prescription
  • Documenting a treatment plan to avoid addiction and overdose

For more details, see the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel article .

Minnesota implements new rules for prescribing opioid painkillers

Each day, 91 people die from an opioid overdose in the U.S., according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention .

To prevent injured workers from ending up with painkiller addictions, the state of Minnesota has adopted stronger requirements for prescribing physicians.

The new rules for long-term opioid prescriptions  took effect in Minnesota on July 13, 2015.

Now, before prescribing long-term opioids, doctors are required to:

  • Affirm that the patient cannot maintain functions of daily life without the medication, doesn’t have somatic symptoms disorder, doesn’t have a history of failure to comply with treatment, and doesn’t have substance abuse disorder.
  • Ensure that all other pain management options have been exhausted.
  • Determine whether the following circumstances are present, and whether they constitute contraindications for long-term opioid use: history of respiratory depression, pregnancy or planned pregnancy, history of substance abuse, suicide risk, poor impulse control, and regular engagement in an activity that could be unsafe for a patient on opioids.
  • Complete a scientific assessment to determine the patient’s risk for abuse.
  • Explain the potential consequences and complications of using opioids long-term to the patient.
  • Enter into a written contract with the patient that includes a provision for drug testing at the doctor’s discretion.

This is not intended to serve as legal advice for individual fact-specific legal cases or as a legal basis for your employment practices.

css.php